First, I need to make it clear that I have no fundamental issue with IT resale or referral arrangements. In fact, I believe that these arrangements play an important role in the IT economy provided that:
I take issue with a consulting firm when it disregards either of the above principles. From a transparency perspective, I have a real problem with the discrete, hush-hush dealings that take place between so many vendors and consultants. From a selection services perspective, I believe that any selection project run by a consultant whose pockets are being lined by a vendor is nothing more than a sham. In my view, it is comparable to a lawsuit where one of the parties pays off the presiding judge.
Sommer would probably agree with my opinions, above. In his article, he also states that consultants paid by vendors should not be in the system selection business. He explains that "these referral fees are paid precisely because the vendor is steering business to another firm". As a result, the selection advisor becomes biased towards the paying alternatives and incapable of rendering an impartial recommendation.
I also believe that Sommer's views apply to the project management component of an ERP implementation project. A vendor or reseller's senior implementer is incapable of rendering an unbiased recommendation when the interests of the software company come into conflict with the interests of the implementing organization.
For example, every implementing company faces a decision as to whether it should either: 1) customize the ERP software to meet the company's business process needs, or 2) restructure the company's business processes to comply with standard ERP functionality. The senior implementers supplied by the ERP vendor or reseller are incentivized to recommend alternative #2. The incentives have to do with the fact that the implementing reseller of vendor is generally responsible for providing future maintenance and support. Customizations complicate their future maintenance service obligations. Now, I do not want to be understood as saying that alternative #2 should never be selected. Rather, what I am saying is that alternative #2 should only be selected when it is in the implementing organization's best interests.
Although the SaaS model is becoming increasingly prevalent for all types of business software, many organizations have been reluctant to switch to SaaS for ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) application modules. The thinking goes that ERP functions are too important to be left to the cloud. more
Among all of the business software applications necessary for business operations, ERP is undoubtedly one of the most important. Making the wrong selection can have a disastrous impact on your accounting, manufacturing, and supply chain. With so much at stake, it is crucial to make a well-informed decision. more
Selecting an ERP system is no easy task. You have to select and configure a system that fits your exact business needs. Getting it right means a myriad of benefits, from increased productivity to reduced costs. Getting it wrong can be a quagmire. Our new comparison guide gives you the data you need to make an informed decision, all in one easy-to-use Excel file. more
Best-in-class mid-market businesses are over twice as likely to deploy their ERP solutions on the cloud. They choose the cloud for scalability, flexibility, usability, and cost. These organizations saw 1.9x improvement in profitability over the past two years as compared to those who have on-premise solutions. more
Do you want to deliver the best service possible to your customers, react quickly to new opportunities, and stay ahead of your competition? more