First, I need to make it clear that I have no fundamental issue with IT resale or referral arrangements. In fact, I believe that these arrangements play an important role in the IT economy provided that:
I take issue with a consulting firm when it disregards either of the above principles. From a transparency perspective, I have a real problem with the discrete, hush-hush dealings that take place between so many vendors and consultants. From a selection services perspective, I believe that any selection project run by a consultant whose pockets are being lined by a vendor is nothing more than a sham. In my view, it is comparable to a lawsuit where one of the parties pays off the presiding judge.
Sommer would probably agree with my opinions, above. In his article, he also states that consultants paid by vendors should not be in the system selection business. He explains that "these referral fees are paid precisely because the vendor is steering business to another firm". As a result, the selection advisor becomes biased towards the paying alternatives and incapable of rendering an impartial recommendation.
I also believe that Sommer's views apply to the project management component of an ERP implementation project. A vendor or reseller's senior implementer is incapable of rendering an unbiased recommendation when the interests of the software company come into conflict with the interests of the implementing organization.
For example, every implementing company faces a decision as to whether it should either: 1) customize the ERP software to meet the company's business process needs, or 2) restructure the company's business processes to comply with standard ERP functionality. The senior implementers supplied by the ERP vendor or reseller are incentivized to recommend alternative #2. The incentives have to do with the fact that the implementing reseller of vendor is generally responsible for providing future maintenance and support. Customizations complicate their future maintenance service obligations. Now, I do not want to be understood as saying that alternative #2 should never be selected. Rather, what I am saying is that alternative #2 should only be selected when it is in the implementing organization's best interests.
ERP is the most complex—and costly—business software product available today. Many businesses struggle to implement an ERP system without breaking the bank. Read this guide to learn more about what you can expect in terms of cost—and how to save money during the implementation process. more
Many retailers are seeing rising expectations among their customers for faster and better service, wherever they—or their customers—are based. To meet these expectations, you need to ensure that your employees—wherever they are—can access your business system, and communicate quickly and efficiently with customers and employees at other locations. more
With the immense changes the retail industry has undergone and continues to face today, there are mistakes that you as a wholesaler simply can’t afford to make. Certainly, one of these—perhaps the greatest of all in our technology-driven age—is choosing the wrong retail business management software for your business. more
Does your current software give your retail business the visibility and flexibility you need to be responsive and competitive? Or has your business outgrown your business management system? more