Traditional CRM v. Social CRM: Is There a Difference?

Updated: April 03, 2010

Making the Transition from CRM to Social CRM


Traditional CRM was defined as a strategy and philosophy that was based on how to manage customers using tools, processes and systems to both understand who your customer was and at the same time provide your business with ways of identifying the life cycle of those customers. It was focused on what have historically been the "customer-facing" departments - sales, marketing and customer support. The driver for its initial success was sales - how do we manage customers in a way that increases our chances of closing deals in the B2B environment or sell "stuff" in the B2C world. Much of its value to sales was based on account information, opportunity management, and, one of the keys to distinguishing salesforce automation (SFA) from simple contact management - pipeline management. The latter gave management visibility into the sales pipeline of salespeople - something that made SFA suffer when it came to adoption. Sales people hated it because their managers had visibility into what they saw as their key assets - the relationships that they had with their customers. Because traditional CRM was largely driven by these sales strategies, processes and applications, it had a high failure rate in its early incarnation. But as companies scaled their expectations appropriately and the CRM industry began to mature, comfort levels with the systems used increased and the programs for success were crafted more and more around a proven set of practices, the rates of success increased commensurately.

---------- Read more below ----------


Traditional CRM was defined by programs that addressed the departments typically called "customer facing" - sales, marketing and customer service. Systems were created by software vendors to, for the most part, automate processes and analyze data that would, if used well increase the ability of the salesperson, marketing maven or customer service representative to do their job more effectively. On the back end the analytics, when used properly, were able to provide a view of an individual customer that let the customer facing employee gain further insight into who the customer was and the likely value of that customer to the company.

But the world changed. The communications revolution that was characterized by the proliferation of Internet use and of mobile devices changed the way that people wanted to (and did) interact with each other and with the institutions that they dealt with. In business this was a transformation of how customers dealt with businesses and with each other. It was reflected by two statistics that are worth mentioning so that you can see why CRM is evolving into Social CRM.

Statistic #1: The Edelman Trust Barometer in 2003 said that when it came to "someone like me" (not necessarily someone you know), 22% saw that as their most "trusted source." In 2004, that number was 51% and it has never looked back.

Statistic #2: The March 2009 Nielsen Online Global Survey found that for the first time, more people (those using the Internet) were communicating via social networks (66.8%) than via email (65.1%).

These are significant numbers because they are the left-brained statistical underpinning for the existence of the social customer. That same social customer, by taking control of the public channels like Facebook, Twitter, the blogosphere, also took control of the business ecosystem, because they no longer had a dependency on the company to either get goods and services that the company provided - since there were so many other options and because they didn't need the company's channels to communicate about the company - they could do that in the public domain.

Social CRM is the response to this new kind of customer and the demands that they make on the company. The key difference (besides the ones below) is that it is based on a strategy for customer engagement rather than managing customers. That means that the company has to realize that what the customer wants from them now, as opposed to five years ago, is enough knowledge and enough tools to make intelligent decisions on how they are going to interact with the company that interests them. There is little option but to provide these things - given the often many choices of similar or identical products and services that the customer has access to.

So what are some of the basic comparisons?
 

 

Comparing Traditional and Social CRM

  1. Social CRM is an extension of CRM, not a replacement so some of the tenets of traditional CRM remain as important as ever.
  2. Make no mistake about it though - even though the benefits will be mutual, to make this work, the business organization has to be realistic and acknowledge that the customer is now in the driver's seat.
  3. It also changes the purpose of CRM from managing relationships with customers to engaging the customers.
  4. That also means that the new business model is different too. The traditional model associated with CRM was based around providing better products and services to the customer - and also good customer service. It was a sales driven model to some degree - thus the first mover in CRM technology was salesforce automation. It was also transaction-focused, driven by purchases. The new model is interaction-driven (though transactions still matter, obviously) and with that, the most interaction-directed pillar, customer service, is emerging not only as the primary of the three pillars of CRM, but as a wrapper around all interactions in business.
  5. This new model is no longer based on just the constant improvement of products and services. At this stage businesses need to be aggregators of products, services, tools and consumable experiences - so that the customer has what they need to sculpt their own involvement with the company that they've chosen to be involved with.
  6. In the longer term, the model will be (hopefully) a company that's sufficiently transparent, institutionally structured and culturally ready to collaborate and innovate directly with the customers.
  7. Social CRM differs too in that it is based on programs that provide both the operational needs of the company to manage the customer and the bidirectional channels of communication with the customer. To make those channels effective, the company has to be culturally ready to give customers information that they are not used to giving such as visibility into a product development cycle - including some say in how the product is developed or what products are developed. Only one example, but you get the idea.
Featured Research
  • SMB CRM Providers Comparison Guide

    A good SMB CRM system can be an incredibly valuable asset for your business. As more businesses recognize this value, the amount of SMB CRM vendors is expanding quickly. Navigating the pricing plans, features, and service terms of all these can be a decision-making nightmare. more

  • CRM and Contact Center Integration

    One of the best ways to improve your customer service is to integrate your CRM and contact center software. Benefits of doing this include:Improved customer satisfaction through more personalized contacts, Better conversions on lead, and Increased employee productivity. more

  • CRM Providers Comparison Guide

    As more businesses recognize this value, the amount of CRM vendors is expanding quickly. There are well over 100 available in 2017. Navigating the pricing plans, features, and service terms of all these can be a decision-making nightmare. more

  • Your Guide to Social Customer Service

    Did you know that 67% of online consumers have used social media for customer service purposes?Unfortunately, many businesses ignore social mentions because they don’t know how to handle them appropriately. This is a problem because managing and responding to these mentions can make or break your brand. more

  • A Guide to Selecting a Customer Portal for your CRM

    This whitepaper provides a guideline for selecting the right customer portal solution for your CRM by following a three-stage process. By comparing in-house and third party SaaS products, we examine present business and technical portal requirements, which are then mapped against the upfront and hidden costs for development and future scalability needs. more