Choosing the right Unified Communications (UC) solution for your small business can be a complex and research intensive task. Finding a solution that will fit your business’ needs without going overboard in terms of budget can be a tall order for small businesses looking for the best Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone system or UC solution. Both ShoreTel and Mitel are well regarded providers of VoIP and UC solutions for businesses of all sizes. With pricing that comes in slightly lower than Cisco, Avaya, and several other well known providers, these two telephony vendors are often compared to one another.
ShoreTel – ShoreTel is known for both their UC hardware and software, and more recently for the service aspects relating to UC communications. Their full service UC suites encompass voice, data, video, and mobile communication and strive to create the perfect solution for all of your business’ communications needs. Advertising a lower TCO than Cisco and Avaya, ShoreTel is often referred to because of the technical complexity of their systems.
Mitel – Mitel is known for the adaptable and scalable nature of their various UC solutions and the unique “freedom architecture” that they employ. Offering versatility and endless variation when it comes to deployment and implementation on any network, Mitel offers an array of comprehensive communications and collaboration software and equipment. Mitel has a focus on creating an “in-office” environment anywhere and allows users to customize everything from mobile and remote extensions.
ShoreTel – ShoreTel is often favored because of the complexity of its networking and communications solutions. Similar in nature to some of the larger and more expensive business communications solutions, ShoreTel’s systems are also easy to use and feature rich. Scalable from very small business environments up to extremely large companies with thousands of users, ShoreTel solutions can grow with your business. ShoreTel is slightly more expensive than Mitel’s comparable systems, and some complain that many of their solutions operate on Microsoft servers.
Mitel – Mitel is touted by many as the cost effective alternative to the comprehensive solutions from larger providers. Their innovative approach to complete UC solutions that allow for extreme mobility and changeability has given them a slightly larger adoption rate than ShoreTel in many areas. Mitel offers its solutions to be deployed as local premise-based, virtualized environment, or cloud hosted solutions and offers a wide range of hardware components to go along with their systems. Many users prefer Mitel handsets and believe that they last longer and outperform competitors. Mitel is sometimes criticized for the slightly less technically complex nature of their systems.
The choice between Mitel and ShoreTel is a matter of organizational preference for most small and medium sized businesses. These two competitors are often compared because of the similarities between their UC offerings and the high levels of service and hardware quality from both. Choosing between the two will likely be a matter of finding the options that best fit your business’ specific needs.
It was a painstaking process, but to help B2B companies start 2017 off on the right foot, we recently compiled a comparative list of the top 43 small to midsize business phone vendors. more
A good VoIP provider will offer additional benefits as well, but many first-time buyers find assessing each option to be difficult. Nevertheless, this is an important step in the buying process because a substandard provider can easily waste both your time and money. more
It was a painstaking process, but to help B2B companies start 2017 off on the right foot, we recently compiled a comparative list of the top 34 business phone vendors in the world. In one, easy-to-reference location, we’ve neatly outlined the information you need. more
Many businesses rely on a collection of communication tools that they adopt to address specific needs as they arise. This strategy may seem to work in the beginning, but eventually will lead to a system that is cumbersome to use, difficult to explain to new hires, expensive, and effective in some areas, but full of gaps. more