Unified Communication Players

By Stan Baldwin
Updated: February 10, 2011

When the goal is to establish a Unified Communication (UC) strategy for your company, the logical place to look first is to your current communication network. Telephone systems provided by AT&T and others are the backbone of real-time communications in many enterprises. Computer networks provided by Microsoft and others are the backbone for asynchronous communications in most companies. It is then no surprise that two of the top vendors for unified communications systems in 2010 were AT&T and Microsoft.

Providers of comprehensive network infrastructure components, such as Cisco and Siemens, also enjoy an aspect of “first mover advantage” thanks to their large installed bases. In an 2010 assessment report Infonetics Research forecasted the unified communications market will reach $1 billion by 2013. Providers with the largest presence and greatest flexibility will continue to dominate.

Mircrosoft

Microsoft proposes to provide “a complete solution”, essentially the goal of every other major player in this market. Their flag-ship integration offering is Lync, featuring a single interface for desktops and hand-held devices which works with other Microsoft products such as SharePoint, Office and Exchange. This system integrates audio, video, messaging, presence, voice and conferencing, covering the majority of functions most companies require. The most frequently cited drawback to an “all Microsoft” implementation is the lack of flexibility, despite their claims of interoperability. Microsoft addresses concerns of a “closed world” by partnering with specialized providers. One recent example is described in a press announcement touting the corded and wireless headsets from Jabra, now “seamlessly integrated” with Microsoft Lync.

AT&T

It should be no surprise AT&T puts the emphasis on their established global network. AT&T Collaboration employs their huge IP network to connect any appropriate device with any other such device. A major component of AT&T's unified communications is AT&T Connect, a feature-rich conferencing service. Along with the audio and video capabilities to establish a conference just about anywhere at anytime, AT&T Connect also features the ability to share and collaborate on documents, share applications, and record the whole event for posterity. As with the other fortunate owners of a significant installed base of equipment serving millions of users, AT&T is actively working to expand their “package” of services by partnering with others in the industry.

Cisco

Foregoing attempts at clever differentiating names Cisco simply calls their system “Cisco Unified Communications”. Leveraging their expertise in some of the more arcane aspects of IP networking, such as Quality of Service, Security and Interoperability, the Cisco Unified Communications system offers enterprise tested IP telephony, IP video conferencing, rich-media conferencing and numerous related services. Many industry-specific unified communications systems utilize Cisco underpinnings.

Siemens

Siemens, on the other hand, has gone all the way over to labeling every aspect of their UC offering as “OpenScape” something or other. Components of their offering include “OpenScape UC Application”, “OpenScape Web Collaboration” (conferencing), “OpenScape PhoneApps” (building on the telephone services of “OpenStage”) and OpenScape Video” (HD and desktop video), just for starters. It appears Siemens would also love to be seen as a provider of the “complete solution” for enterprise unified communications. Possibly to counter the “everything under one roof” positioning, “OpenScape Fusion Developer Program” allows other parties to create unique features and capabilities.

For the immediate future, the big players are likely to get bigger, more partnerships will be forged with a growing hoard of smaller industry members, and standards will out-pace proprietary interfaces.

Featured Research
  • 7 Ways the Wrong Phone System Can Haunt Your Business

    The wrong phone system could be haunting your business - and we’re talking about problems more serious than ghosts and ghouls. From increased costs to issues with scaling, we’ve identified seven important ways that a less than ideal phone system could be holding you back. You’ll be surprised at how much of a difference this can make to your bottom line too. more

  • Ditch Your Fax Servers

    An in-house fax server gives an IT department centralized management and monitoring over the entire enterprise's faxing. This can help your company track usage and better maintain records for auditing and record keeping. However, there are serious drawbacks that come with utilizing an in-house fax server solution and these range from security to cost-prohibitive pricing. more

  • The IT Manager's Survival Guide

    As an IT manager, maintaining physical fax servers and infrastructure is not a high priority. However, fax capability remains a business need simply because chances are your industry is dependent on its security. What if there was a way to reduce the amount of time spent handling fax complaints and maintaining physical servers? And this way took into account security, cost savings, and freed up your IT resources. Would you be interested? more

  • VoIP: Your New Secret Weapon for a Strong Year End

    As the end of 2017 nears, you may be feeling pressure to make sure you close the year out strong.If you’ve been sitting on the fence regarding VoIP, this may be the perfect time to switch. VoIP options had never been better or more full-featured than they are now, and it may be just the thing your business needs to see a productivity and profitability boost. more

  • Is Your Phone System Stealing Profits?

    Having the wrong phone system can dramatically cut into your profits. Despite this, many businesses just sign up for a plan or platform that seems ‘good enough’. If you haven’t carefully considered your options and the included features, there’s a very good chance that you are leaving money on the table in some way. more